Tribunal : Member J Silva The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) set aside a decision by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration (the Department) and substitutes a decision not to cancel the applicant’s Subclass 866 (Protection) visa. The applicant had arrived in Aus...
The purpose of this Annual Report is to inform the Attorney-General, the Parliament, Tribunal users and the general public about the performance of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the AAT) during the period 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004. The 2003-04 Annual Report can be d...
The purpose of this Annual Report is to inform the Attorney-General, the Parliament, Tribunal users and the general public about the performance of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the AAT) during the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005. The 2004-2005 Annual Report can be...
What information can I give to support my case? You can give us new information that you think supports your case. You should give it to us as soon as you can. We might also direct you to give us information if we think we need it to make the decision. You must give us any ...
Do I need to pay an application fee? Yes. How much do I have to pay? The standard application fee is $1,121 . Can I pay a reduced fee? Yes, a reduced fee of $100 can be paid if: legal aid has been granted for the review you hold a health care card, pensioner concessi...
Do I need to pay an application fee? You do not need to pay an application fee if you lodge an application for a second review of most Centrelink decisions. An application fee is only payable for a second review of a decision about Paid Parental Leave . How much do I have...
Tribunal: Deputy President Jan Redfern (presiding member) and Senior Member Michael Ison This matter concerned the cancellation of a special category Subclass 444 visa where the visa holder was a New Zealand citizen but a long-standing resident of Australia and had been ch...
PDF version (21 KB) 29 March 2012 When I was appointed to the Federal Court of Australia and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in 2002 it was Government policy to abolish the Tribunal and replace it with a less independent Tribunal to be called the Administrative Revi...
Tribunal: Member Stephanie Brakespeare Ms Wolford was paying child support to Mr Fendi for their two children. Both Mr Fendi and Ms Wolford applied to the Department of Human Services to change the amount of child support that needed to be paid from mid-2017 to mid-2018. ...
Is there a time limit for applying? Yes, there are time limits for some Centrelink decisions. These are listed below. There is no time limit for other Centrelink decisions. However, you might not receive back payment if you do not apply within 13 weeks after being given n...
TRIBUNAL : Deputy President B Rayment The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) affirmed a reviewable decision by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (the Agency) not to disclose conditionally exempt documents which remained in contention by the applicant. ...
Tribunal: Senior Member Andrew Nikolic AM CSC The applicant’s Australian Citizenship application was refused by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. On 18 January 2018, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed the decision under review. ...
If you don’t agree with a decision that's been made by a Commonwealth Government department or other organisation there may be something you can do about it. You can apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Or AAT for short. What does the AAT do? The AAT can review a...
Tribunal: Senior Member Adria Poljak The Department of Immigration and Border Protection (the Department) refused to grant the applicant Australian citizenship. The applicant applied to the AAT for a review of the decision. The applicant, a citizen of Zambia, arrived in ...
Tribunal: Senior Member C Puplick The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) reviewed a decision made by the Department of Home Affairs (the Department) refusing a citizenship[1] application. The applicant lodged her citizenship application in May 2018. In June 2019 the De...
Tribunal: Member C Smolicz The applicant applied to the AAT for review of a decision made by the Department of Home Affairs (the Department) to refuse to grant her a protection visa. Australia has an obligation under the Migration Act 1958 to protect individuals who are f...
Tribunal: Member Adrienne Millbank The Department of Home Affairs (the Department) cancelled the applicant’s Student visa. The applicant requested a review of the decision by the AAT. The applicant arrived in Australia and enrolled in a Master of Information Technology co...
Tribunal: Member J Cripps-Watts The AAT remitted the decision not to grant a Distinguished Talent (Residence) visa, instead asking the Department to reconsider in light of evidence that the applicant was eminent in the field of international trade negotiation. The Disting...
Tribunal: Member R Bellamy The AAT affirmed a decision of the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (the Department) not to revoke the mandatory cancellation of the applicant’s spouse visa. He was found to not be of good characte...
Tribunal : Senior Member P Fairall An application for citizenship was rejected by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs on the basis that the applicant was not a permanent resident when the application was made....
Pages: 20 of 25